The latest from our friend and colleague Frank Salinger in DC. Follow Frank on Twitter @annapolislawyer
March 2012
THOUGHTS ON BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT
And so it begins…and my pick for VP
The end of Rick Santorum’s quixotic campaign (his withdrawal was the most gracious speech he made to date) begins the next chapter in the election. Governor Romney can now begin the necessary drift to the center to appeal to suburban independents who’ve lost hope and haven’t particularly enjoyed the change promised back in 2008.
Etch A Sketch jokes aside, all presidential campaigns click a metaphorical reset button and begin to tailor their appeal to voters who are neither community organizers nor tea partiers―although it’s hard to sea how President Obama recasts himself as a friend of the same middle class whose pockets he’s been trying to pick for three years.
Like lobbying (and, arguably, much of life), campaigns are about communication. This week’s flap involved Democratic operative Hilary Rosen’s attack on Ann Romney who stayed at home to raise five sons as “never worked a day in her life.”
Beyond the pointlessness of attacking Mrs. Romney, who appears to have charmed audiences during the primaries, it’s hard for me to see what’s ever gained by attacking a mother of five.
Ms. Rosen went on to make things worse by claiming that Mrs. Romney couldn’t appreciate personal ―evidently Mrs. Romney’s struggles with breast cancer and multiple sclerosis are no big deal since the
Romney’s are wealthy. One could only imagine the media outcry had the GOP taken on Elizabeth Edwards. Forgetting the first rule of any self-inflicted crisis: “When you’re in a hole, stop digging,” Ms. Rosen followed up with “spare me the faux outrage.” The latter a statement of non-contrition worthy of Rush Limbaugh.
Not surprisingly, the grown-ups in the Obama campaign quickly distanced themselves from Ms. Rosen’s remarks.
From the communications and lobbying perspective, I see two takeaways. First, get your message straight. Do you really want to trash motherhood? Do you really want to go after a popular person who seems genuinely nice?
Next, assuming the upper reaches of the Democratic campaign really wanted to do this, who should deliver the message? I could see an ad with some single mother in a single-wide trailer in Appalachia claiming the dressage-riding wife of a millionaire doesn’t understand her daily struggles. Don’t know what that gets them, but at least it could appear somewhat believable. But to have an expensive lobbyist and PR flack like Hilary Rosen bear that message is simply absurd.
Ms. Rosen is best known as the former chief lobbyist and CEO for the Recording Industry of America and led the fight against file sharing services like Napster. Her biggest accomplishment was teeing up the enhanced copyright law that allows multi-billion dollar studios to sue families and obtain huge cash settlements from parents whose children violated the Orwellian Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
I have no quarrel with lobbyists, after all that’s what I do. I’m glad Ms. Rosen represented BP after the oil spill and and fights against stronger nutrition laws. I do question is whether this makes her the ideal spokesperson for downtrodden working women.
At the end of the day, the essence of messaging, whether in direct lobbying or via public affairs program, is simple: First, understand the substance of the issue. Next, distill your position to a clear, truthful message. Finally, advocate for your position in the offices, committee rooms, halls and, yes, even the lobbies, of Congress and the agencies or in the media (both old and new).
But even the best crafted message becomes garbled with the wrong messenger. This week the Democrats had both the wrong message and messenger.
In the world of political campaigning, the ultimate messenger is often the vice presidential candidate. They get to say more outrageous things and can keep their party’s base happy. The vice presidency is one of those things, like Velveeta or Pop Tarts that everyone claims not to like or want but no one turns down.
I believe this will be a close election and history teaches us that the road to the White House for a Republican nominee cuts straight through Ohio. No surprise seven Republican presidents were from there (as was one Whig). That’s why I believe, while Marco Rubio has more glamor, the GOP will nominate Ohio Senator Rob Portman. It may be the least flashy ticket since Harding-Coolidge or Carter-Mondale but, hey, they won.
Portman is a former congressman, US Trade Representative and head of the Office of Management & Budget. While doing so gave talk radio hosts a collective hemorrhage, he supported the automobile industry bailout―a position that helps in the auto states of Ohio, Michigan and Indiana.
One thing for certain, to will be a fascinating remainder of the year. Let’s get started.
Frank Salinger